<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as export of services under the Export of Services Rules, 2005. Consequently, the demand for service tax on the commission received by the appellant under &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; was set aside. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming the service tax demand for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:00:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as export of services under the Export of Services Rules, 2005. Consequently, the demand for service tax on the commission received by the appellant under &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; was set aside. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming the service tax demand for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>