https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292351 An order made in summary proceedings under the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920, did not operate as res judicata or finally preclude later challenge by non-parties to the existence of a public religious trust. On the property issue, the grant in perpetuity, the family's continued control of worship and offerings, the treatment of shops and ceremonies as family matters, and related surrounding circumstances supported private ownership rather than public dedication. Mere public resort, use, or popularity of the temple was insufficient on its own to establish a public religious trust. en-us Tue, 10 Oct 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:11:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292351 An order made in summary proceedings under the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920, did not operate as res judicata or finally preclude later challenge by non-parties to the existence of a public religious trust. On the property issue, the grant in perpetuity, the family's continued control of worship and offerings, the treatment of shops and ceremonies as family matters, and related surrounding circumstances supported private ownership rather than public dedication. Mere public resort, use, or popularity of the temple was insufficient on its own to establish a public religious trust. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Oct 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292351