https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292356 The Privy Council held that the property in question, including Baghichi Thakaran and associated properties, did not demonstrate adequate evidence to establish a public trust for charitable or religious purposes. The lack of explicit dedication, coupled with historical and legal analysis, led to the dismissal of the High Court's judgment and the restoration of the trial court's decree. The burden of proof regarding the existence of a public trust was not met by the defendants, resulting in the appeal being allowed, with costs awarded to the appellant. en-us Tue, 03 May 1938 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:11:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292356 The Privy Council held that the property in question, including Baghichi Thakaran and associated properties, did not demonstrate adequate evidence to establish a public trust for charitable or religious purposes. The lack of explicit dedication, coupled with historical and legal analysis, led to the dismissal of the High Court's judgment and the restoration of the trial court's decree. The burden of proof regarding the existence of a public trust was not met by the defendants, resulting in the appeal being allowed, with costs awarded to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 May 1938 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292356