https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292348 Deeds of dedication were construed as a whole, and the language of the arpannama was treated as an outright dedication of the properties to the deity rather than a mere charge for debsheba; the properties were therefore debutter properties. The earlier suit did not bar the present suit under Order 9, Rule 9 CPC because it had been instituted in the name of the idol by a next friend without legal authority, and a Hindu idol ordinarily must sue through a shebait or properly appointed representative. The Court also treated the present claim as arising from a fresh attempt to execute against the deity's property, giving rise to a new cause of action. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 1941 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:26:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292348 Deeds of dedication were construed as a whole, and the language of the arpannama was treated as an outright dedication of the properties to the deity rather than a mere charge for debsheba; the properties were therefore debutter properties. The earlier suit did not bar the present suit under Order 9, Rule 9 CPC because it had been instituted in the name of the idol by a next friend without legal authority, and a Hindu idol ordinarily must sue through a shebait or properly appointed representative. The Court also treated the present claim as arising from a fresh attempt to execute against the deity's property, giving rise to a new cause of action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jun 1941 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292348