https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292345 The Privy Council dismissed the Respondent's suit in a case involving disputed jummas claimed by the Plaintiff based on purchase from Defendants. The Appellant, representing an infant, contested the hereditary tenure and invariable rent. Lower courts affirmed the sale but disputed the tenure's fixed rent status. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity on tenure nature and proof of fixed rent. Fabricated evidence raised doubts, leading to the dismissal of the suit. The Plaintiff was advised to establish a valid claim based on mouroosee title at a variable rent in a separate suit. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 1869 00:00:00 +0553 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 12:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292345 The Privy Council dismissed the Respondent's suit in a case involving disputed jummas claimed by the Plaintiff based on purchase from Defendants. The Appellant, representing an infant, contested the hereditary tenure and invariable rent. Lower courts affirmed the sale but disputed the tenure's fixed rent status. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity on tenure nature and proof of fixed rent. Fabricated evidence raised doubts, leading to the dismissal of the suit. The Plaintiff was advised to establish a valid claim based on mouroosee title at a variable rent in a separate suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Dec 1869 00:00:00 +0553 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292345