https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292343 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment that the grant was a specific endowment for the deity's services, rejecting the appellant's claim of it being a personal grant. The court also affirmed the application of the Cy-pres doctrine to allocate the entire income to the deity, dismissing the appeal. Additionally, the decision to allow the amendment of the prayer clause was upheld, as it was deemed justified by the Supreme Court. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 12:26:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292343 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment that the grant was a specific endowment for the deity's services, rejecting the appellant's claim of it being a personal grant. The court also affirmed the application of the Cy-pres doctrine to allocate the entire income to the deity, dismissing the appeal. Additionally, the decision to allow the amendment of the prayer clause was upheld, as it was deemed justified by the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292343