https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292341 Historical grants and inam records were read together to determine whether the institution was a temple under the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1926. The Court held that the grants were made to the Bavajee or Sadavarti institution for maintenance, charity, and feeding of travellers and fakirs, not to the temple itself. References in later inam entries to the temple were treated as subsequent assumptions, while the oral evidence did not establish public worship as of right. The institution was therefore not a statutory temple, because public religious use and a corresponding public right of worship were not proved. en-us Fri, 22 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 12:04:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292341 Historical grants and inam records were read together to determine whether the institution was a temple under the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1926. The Court held that the grants were made to the Bavajee or Sadavarti institution for maintenance, charity, and feeding of travellers and fakirs, not to the temple itself. References in later inam entries to the temple were treated as subsequent assumptions, while the oral evidence did not establish public worship as of right. The institution was therefore not a statutory temple, because public religious use and a corresponding public right of worship were not proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292341