https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292339 The court determined that the disputed lands were temple properties, not the private property of the trustee. The trustee was found guilty of misfeasance, breach of trust, and falsification of accounts, leading to his removal from office. A new trustee of good standing was to be appointed by the High Court to manage the temple properties according to a scheme outlined by the District Court. The respondent was directed to cover the costs of the appeal. en-us Thu, 06 Apr 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:49:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292339 The court determined that the disputed lands were temple properties, not the private property of the trustee. The trustee was found guilty of misfeasance, breach of trust, and falsification of accounts, leading to his removal from office. A new trustee of good standing was to be appointed by the High Court to manage the temple properties according to a scheme outlined by the District Court. The respondent was directed to cover the costs of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Apr 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292339