https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292338 The Court upheld the plaintiffs' entitlement to participate in the bhog offering to idols consecrated by their ancestor. The dedication of properties for worship was deemed valid, with income consistently applied to idol worship. Male descendants traditionally served as shebaits, while female descendants participated in the bhog offering, reflecting the founders' intentions. The founder's authority to direct shebaitship and participation rights was upheld under Hindu Law principles. The decree dismissing the appeal confirmed the plaintiffs' participation rights, emphasizing the importance of honoring traditions and the founder's authority in determining participation rights. en-us Mon, 14 Aug 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292338 The Court upheld the plaintiffs' entitlement to participate in the bhog offering to idols consecrated by their ancestor. The dedication of properties for worship was deemed valid, with income consistently applied to idol worship. Male descendants traditionally served as shebaits, while female descendants participated in the bhog offering, reflecting the founders' intentions. The founder's authority to direct shebaitship and participation rights was upheld under Hindu Law principles. The decree dismissing the appeal confirmed the plaintiffs' participation rights, emphasizing the importance of honoring traditions and the founder's authority in determining participation rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Aug 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292338