<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1192 - ANDHRA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292336</link>
    <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal because the SARFAESI framework incorporates the procedure of the RDDBFI Act and contains no express exclusion of the Limitation Act. Section 29(2) therefore brings in Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, including the power to condone delay. The Tribunal accordingly has jurisdiction to examine a delay-condonation request on merits, and the contrary view was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1192 - ANDHRA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292336</link>
      <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal because the SARFAESI framework incorporates the procedure of the RDDBFI Act and contains no express exclusion of the Limitation Act. Section 29(2) therefore brings in Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, including the power to condone delay. The Tribunal accordingly has jurisdiction to examine a delay-condonation request on merits, and the contrary view was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>