<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Challenge Due to Delay; Goods and Vehicle Detained for Lack of E-Way Bill u/s 129(3).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55969</link>
    <description>Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - detention on the ground that the goods in question were being transported without E-Way Bill - The challenge sought to be raised to the order passed under Section 129 (3) of the Act, 2017, having been made at a belated stage, we are of the view that the relief claimed in this regard in terms of relief clause (I), would be barred by laches - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:38:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:38:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Challenge Due to Delay; Goods and Vehicle Detained for Lack of E-Way Bill u/s 129(3).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55969</link>
      <description>Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - detention on the ground that the goods in question were being transported without E-Way Bill - The challenge sought to be raised to the order passed under Section 129 (3) of the Act, 2017, having been made at a belated stage, we are of the view that the relief claimed in this regard in terms of relief clause (I), would be barred by laches - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:38:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>