<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401940</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order under Section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material found during a search operation. The court emphasized the necessity of establishing a valid basis for jurisdiction under Section 153C. The appeals challenging the assessment were dismissed as no substantial question of law requiring consideration was identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401940</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order under Section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material found during a search operation. The court emphasized the necessity of establishing a valid basis for jurisdiction under Section 153C. The appeals challenging the assessment were dismissed as no substantial question of law requiring consideration was identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>