<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 737 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401938</link>
    <description>The court held that the appellant was not eligible for benefits under the first proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14 as registration was granted after amending the trust deed. The court emphasized strict interpretation of exemption provisions in favor of the Revenue and dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, ruling against the appellant on Substantial Questions of Law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 737 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401938</link>
      <description>The court held that the appellant was not eligible for benefits under the first proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14 as registration was granted after amending the trust deed. The court emphasized strict interpretation of exemption provisions in favor of the Revenue and dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, ruling against the appellant on Substantial Questions of Law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>