<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24071</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that sections 40A(8) and 40A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can operate concurrently. The Court directed the Tribunal to assess the reasonableness of interest payments to directors and their relations and determine appropriate disallowances under the relevant provisions. The Tribunal was instructed to consider the 15% disallowance under section 40A(8) even if no excessive payments were found under section 40A(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:01:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24071</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that sections 40A(8) and 40A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can operate concurrently. The Court directed the Tribunal to assess the reasonableness of interest payments to directors and their relations and determine appropriate disallowances under the relevant provisions. The Tribunal was instructed to consider the 15% disallowance under section 40A(8) even if no excessive payments were found under section 40A(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>