https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401909 The Court declined to interfere in the ongoing electoral process despite acknowledging the challenge to the constitutionality of Rule 20(4)(vi) of the Companies Rules. It directed respondents to file detailed affidavits in response to the petitioner's contentions, declined the prayer for interim relief, and scheduled further hearings. The judgment highlighted the importance of minimal interference once the electoral process has commenced, emphasizing digital signing for official communication and setting a future date for proceedings. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:54:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401909 The Court declined to interfere in the ongoing electoral process despite acknowledging the challenge to the constitutionality of Rule 20(4)(vi) of the Companies Rules. It directed respondents to file detailed affidavits in response to the petitioner's contentions, declined the prayer for interim relief, and scheduled further hearings. The judgment highlighted the importance of minimal interference once the electoral process has commenced, emphasizing digital signing for official communication and setting a future date for proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401909