https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401901 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-adjudication. The Tribunal criticized the rejection of the refund claim, citing violations of natural justice principles and inadequate consideration of legal precedents. Emphasizing the non-profit nature of the housing society and the need for proper assessment, the Tribunal set aside the earlier order and directed a fresh review based on notification requirements and judicial principles. The case was remanded for further consideration on 16.12.2020. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:40:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401901 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-adjudication. The Tribunal criticized the rejection of the refund claim, citing violations of natural justice principles and inadequate consideration of legal precedents. Emphasizing the non-profit nature of the housing society and the need for proper assessment, the Tribunal set aside the earlier order and directed a fresh review based on notification requirements and judicial principles. The case was remanded for further consideration on 16.12.2020. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401901