https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896 Parallel adjudication of protective rebate-recovery demands should be deferred where the same dispute is pending before the competent revisionary forum. Challenges had been refused for non-deposit while protective demands concerning the identical rebate issue proceeded, despite a pending revision application against an earlier appellate order. The original authority should await the revision outcome rather than independently adjudicate the protective notices. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded with directions to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance until the revision application is decided. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896 Parallel adjudication of protective rebate-recovery demands should be deferred where the same dispute is pending before the competent revisionary forum. Challenges had been refused for non-deposit while protective demands concerning the identical rebate issue proceeded, despite a pending revision application against an earlier appellate order. The original authority should await the revision outcome rather than independently adjudicate the protective notices. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded with directions to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance until the revision application is decided. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896