https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896 Where a rebate dispute is already pending before the Revisionary Authority, parallel adjudication of protective recovery demands on the same issue should be deferred. The note states that once a revision application has been filed against the earlier appellate order, the original authority ought to keep the subsequent proceedings in abeyance rather than proceed independently on the same controversy. It also notes that the Revenue's later clarification supported postponement until the revision was decided. The impugned orders were therefore set aside and the matter remanded with directions to keep the proceedings in abeyance pending the revision outcome. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896 Where a rebate dispute is already pending before the Revisionary Authority, parallel adjudication of protective recovery demands on the same issue should be deferred. The note states that once a revision application has been filed against the earlier appellate order, the original authority ought to keep the subsequent proceedings in abeyance rather than proceed independently on the same controversy. It also notes that the Revenue's later clarification supported postponement until the revision was decided. The impugned orders were therefore set aside and the matter remanded with directions to keep the proceedings in abeyance pending the revision outcome. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401896