<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 689 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401890</link>
    <description>The Court found the demand for payment based on dishonored cheques before completion of assessment to be illegal. The Court quashed the demand and allowed the Writ Petition, stating that coercive recovery without an assessment order is unlawful. The respondents were given liberty to complete the assessment and recover any dues lawfully determined after assessment proceedings. No costs were awarded, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 689 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401890</link>
      <description>The Court found the demand for payment based on dishonored cheques before completion of assessment to be illegal. The Court quashed the demand and allowed the Writ Petition, stating that coercive recovery without an assessment order is unlawful. The respondents were given liberty to complete the assessment and recover any dues lawfully determined after assessment proceedings. No costs were awarded, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>