<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1395 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292324</link>
    <description>Interim restraint may be granted to protect a company asset from transfer where a proposed dealing under a board resolution appears prima facie to breach related-party restrictions. The Tribunal applied the established tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable prejudice, and treated protection of the asset pending adjudication as just and equitable. It also accepted that a fresh interim application remained maintainable because the earlier order had ceased to operate in changed circumstances. On that basis, dealing with the land was restrained pending decision on the Section 8 application and, if needed, until final disposal of the company petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:17:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1395 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292324</link>
      <description>Interim restraint may be granted to protect a company asset from transfer where a proposed dealing under a board resolution appears prima facie to breach related-party restrictions. The Tribunal applied the established tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable prejudice, and treated protection of the asset pending adjudication as just and equitable. It also accepted that a fresh interim application remained maintainable because the earlier order had ceased to operate in changed circumstances. On that basis, dealing with the land was restrained pending decision on the Section 8 application and, if needed, until final disposal of the company petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>