<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1398 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of a petition under Rule 11 of NCLT, 2016, even after admission, following a joint memo of compromise between the parties. Citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. &amp;amp; anr. v. Union of India &amp;amp; ors., the Tribunal exercised its discretion to permit withdrawal. The Corporate Debtor was instructed to reimburse the IRP&#039;s expenses and return any assets taken into custody. The Board of Directors&#039; suspended powers were reinstated upon allowing the withdrawal. This case underscores the Tribunal&#039;s authority to allow withdrawal post-admission and the significance of parties reaching settlements in insolvency matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:17:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1398 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of a petition under Rule 11 of NCLT, 2016, even after admission, following a joint memo of compromise between the parties. Citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. &amp;amp; anr. v. Union of India &amp;amp; ors., the Tribunal exercised its discretion to permit withdrawal. The Corporate Debtor was instructed to reimburse the IRP&#039;s expenses and return any assets taken into custody. The Board of Directors&#039; suspended powers were reinstated upon allowing the withdrawal. This case underscores the Tribunal&#039;s authority to allow withdrawal post-admission and the significance of parties reaching settlements in insolvency matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>