<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Addition u/s 68 for Unexplained Loan; No Written Contract or Creditor Identity Established.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55950</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained loan - Neither any written contract nor any identity of the Creditor, having been established in the present case, we cannot find any fault with the findings concurrently rendered by the three authorities below, that the said addition deserves to be made under Section 68 - . Merely because other two loan transactions, with two other persons was believed to be genuine and additions were set aside, that is not a sufficient ground to hold that a similar treatment should have been given with respect to the alleged loan transaction of M/s.AR.Com also - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:35:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:35:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Addition u/s 68 for Unexplained Loan; No Written Contract or Creditor Identity Established.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55950</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained loan - Neither any written contract nor any identity of the Creditor, having been established in the present case, we cannot find any fault with the findings concurrently rendered by the three authorities below, that the said addition deserves to be made under Section 68 - . Merely because other two loan transactions, with two other persons was believed to be genuine and additions were set aside, that is not a sufficient ground to hold that a similar treatment should have been given with respect to the alleged loan transaction of M/s.AR.Com also - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:35:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>