<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 651 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401852</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for assessment years 2012-13, affirming the deletion of deemed dividend addition in the partners&#039; hands. The Court held that further addition in the partners&#039; hands would result in double addition, which was deemed unfair and unreasonable. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, considering the principle of avoiding double additions and ensuring fairness in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 651 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401852</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for assessment years 2012-13, affirming the deletion of deemed dividend addition in the partners&#039; hands. The Court held that further addition in the partners&#039; hands would result in double addition, which was deemed unfair and unreasonable. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, considering the principle of avoiding double additions and ensuring fairness in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>