https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401847 The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the Company's name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite facing striking off due to non-compliance, the Company successfully petitioned for restoration, citing unintentional non-filing caused by various factors. The Registrar of Companies did not oppose the petition but emphasized procedural compliance. The Tribunal, considering economic challenges and the interest of justice, restored the Company's name subject to conditions like filing statutory documents, payment of costs, and prompt resumption of business operations to balance legal compliance with practical considerations and protect stakeholders' interests effectively. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:33:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401847 The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the Company's name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite facing striking off due to non-compliance, the Company successfully petitioned for restoration, citing unintentional non-filing caused by various factors. The Registrar of Companies did not oppose the petition but emphasized procedural compliance. The Tribunal, considering economic challenges and the interest of justice, restored the Company's name subject to conditions like filing statutory documents, payment of costs, and prompt resumption of business operations to balance legal compliance with practical considerations and protect stakeholders' interests effectively. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401847