<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Restores Appeal After CESTAT Dismissal Due to Misunderstanding on COD Permission Requirement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55935</link>
    <description>Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed only on the ground that Committee on Disputes (COD) permission has not been taken at the time of filing of the appeal and till its disposal - on the date on which appeal was dismissed by the learned CESTAT, there was no bar in proceeding with the matter in the absence of COD permission. - CESTAT proceeded on an erroneous understanding of law - Appeal restored - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:32:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Restores Appeal After CESTAT Dismissal Due to Misunderstanding on COD Permission Requirement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55935</link>
      <description>Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed only on the ground that Committee on Disputes (COD) permission has not been taken at the time of filing of the appeal and till its disposal - on the date on which appeal was dismissed by the learned CESTAT, there was no bar in proceeding with the matter in the absence of COD permission. - CESTAT proceeded on an erroneous understanding of law - Appeal restored - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:32:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>