<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 635 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401836</link>
    <description>A public sector undertaking or government entity could institute an appeal or other proceeding to preserve limitation even without Committee on Disputes clearance, because the earlier restriction affected only further prosecution, not filing itself. Once the directions requiring COD permission were recalled, the Tribunal could not refuse to decide the appeal on merits merely for absence of clearance. The dismissal for want of COD approval was therefore unsustainable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 635 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401836</link>
      <description>A public sector undertaking or government entity could institute an appeal or other proceeding to preserve limitation even without Committee on Disputes clearance, because the earlier restriction affected only further prosecution, not filing itself. Once the directions requiring COD permission were recalled, the Tribunal could not refuse to decide the appeal on merits merely for absence of clearance. The dismissal for want of COD approval was therefore unsustainable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>