<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401834</link>
    <description>The Department filed an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing CENVAT credit to the respondent. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the denial of CENVAT credit for the period from April 2016 to June 2017. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide evidence of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision being set aside in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401834</link>
      <description>The Department filed an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing CENVAT credit to the respondent. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the denial of CENVAT credit for the period from April 2016 to June 2017. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide evidence of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision being set aside in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>