https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9590 Revenue authorities disregarded binding Supreme Court precedents to confirm demands and appropriate deposits, exemplified by the Jumbo Bags matter where DTA sales against foreign exchange were equated with permitted exports but benefits were denied, and by post Bhayana Builders decisions where valuation rules for taxable services established by the Supreme Court were ignored in favour of inapposite authority; the article condemns repeated show cause notices and invocation of extended limitation for facts already known to authorities as contravening judicial discipline. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:29 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9590 Revenue authorities disregarded binding Supreme Court precedents to confirm demands and appropriate deposits, exemplified by the Jumbo Bags matter where DTA sales against foreign exchange were equated with permitted exports but benefits were denied, and by post Bhayana Builders decisions where valuation rules for taxable services established by the Supreme Court were ignored in favour of inapposite authority; the article condemns repeated show cause notices and invocation of extended limitation for facts already known to authorities as contravening judicial discipline. Articles Service Tax Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:29 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9590