https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292305 A Deputy Commissioner's injunction could not bar registration where both the person and the property were outside his territorial jurisdiction. A Sub-Registrar's disqualifying interest in the property did not invalidate a registration completed in good faith, because the defect was treated as procedural and protected by the saving provision for honest acts. A later trusteenama appointing trustees as superintendents or managers, without vesting ownership or transferring an interest in immovable property, did not require registration under the Registration Act of 1877. On these grounds, the decree for the respondents was sustained. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:14:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292305 A Deputy Commissioner's injunction could not bar registration where both the person and the property were outside his territorial jurisdiction. A Sub-Registrar's disqualifying interest in the property did not invalidate a registration completed in good faith, because the defect was treated as procedural and protected by the saving provision for honest acts. A later trusteenama appointing trustees as superintendents or managers, without vesting ownership or transferring an interest in immovable property, did not require registration under the Registration Act of 1877. On these grounds, the decree for the respondents was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jun 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292305