https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292304 A mutwalli recorded in the khewat as a co-sharer may maintain a suit for profits under the Agra Tenancy Act, because the decisive factor is the recorded share and the liability attached to it, not full proprietary estate in the share. The Act was read to treat co-sharer in a practical sense, so a manager of wakf property who stands recorded as holding the share and is liable for revenue through the lambardar falls within that expression. On that basis, the contrary view of the courts below was rejected and the suit for profits was held maintainable. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 1933 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:11:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292304 A mutwalli recorded in the khewat as a co-sharer may maintain a suit for profits under the Agra Tenancy Act, because the decisive factor is the recorded share and the liability attached to it, not full proprietary estate in the share. The Act was read to treat co-sharer in a practical sense, so a manager of wakf property who stands recorded as holding the share and is liable for revenue through the lambardar falls within that expression. On that basis, the contrary view of the courts below was rejected and the suit for profits was held maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 1933 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292304