<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1325 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292284</link>
    <description>An order refusing police custody remand is not necessarily interlocutory where it finally determines the remand request on that occasion, so revision is maintainable against it. The statutory limit on police custody is applied with reference to continuous custody and the relevant remand period; where the accused are released on bail and custody is broken, the earlier period does not continue so as to bar reconsideration of police custody. On that reasoning, the time-limit objection failed, the challenge to the Sessions Court order was rejected, and the Magistrate was left free to consider the effect of the bail order in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1325 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292284</link>
      <description>An order refusing police custody remand is not necessarily interlocutory where it finally determines the remand request on that occasion, so revision is maintainable against it. The statutory limit on police custody is applied with reference to continuous custody and the relevant remand period; where the accused are released on bail and custody is broken, the earlier period does not continue so as to bar reconsideration of police custody. On that reasoning, the time-limit objection failed, the challenge to the Sessions Court order was rejected, and the Magistrate was left free to consider the effect of the bail order in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>