https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401824 Provisional release of seized goods under Section 67(6) and the availability of writ relief were considered alongside the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107. The High Court declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction where the petitioner had already filed a pending appeal under the statute, and held that the issue of entitlement to release could be examined in that appeal. The writ petition was dismissed, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the pending appeal expeditiously. en-us Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401824 Provisional release of seized goods under Section 67(6) and the availability of writ relief were considered alongside the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107. The High Court declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction where the petitioner had already filed a pending appeal under the statute, and held that the issue of entitlement to release could be examined in that appeal. The writ petition was dismissed, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the pending appeal expeditiously. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401824