<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 622 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401823</link>
    <description>A refund application was stated to have been accepted, and the remaining grievances were not pursued further. The only operative relief recorded was a direction that the refund application be decided expeditiously and in accordance with law. The petitioner was left at liberty to take appropriate proceedings if the refund claim was not accepted. No substantive determination was made on the remaining prayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 622 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401823</link>
      <description>A refund application was stated to have been accepted, and the remaining grievances were not pursued further. The only operative relief recorded was a direction that the refund application be decided expeditiously and in accordance with law. The petitioner was left at liberty to take appropriate proceedings if the refund claim was not accepted. No substantive determination was made on the remaining prayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>