https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401817 Proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were not interfered with because no ground was made out at that stage to challenge the complaint or related proceedings. The court nevertheless preserved the petitioner's ability to seek anticipatory bail by directing that, if an application was filed within the stipulated period, the Special Judge should decide it expeditiously and no coercive action should be taken until then. The note reflects that limited interim protection may be granted even where substantive interference in PMLA proceedings is declined. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:44:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401817 Proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were not interfered with because no ground was made out at that stage to challenge the complaint or related proceedings. The court nevertheless preserved the petitioner's ability to seek anticipatory bail by directing that, if an application was filed within the stipulated period, the Special Judge should decide it expeditiously and no coercive action should be taken until then. The note reflects that limited interim protection may be granted even where substantive interference in PMLA proceedings is declined. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401817