<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 613 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401814</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the tax case appeals by the Revenue, affirming that the disallowance under Rule 8D cannot exceed the exempted income earned by the assessee during the relevant assessment year. The substantial question of law was answered against the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasizing the need for satisfaction by the Assessing Authority in the computation under Rule 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 613 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401814</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the tax case appeals by the Revenue, affirming that the disallowance under Rule 8D cannot exceed the exempted income earned by the assessee during the relevant assessment year. The substantial question of law was answered against the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasizing the need for satisfaction by the Assessing Authority in the computation under Rule 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>