<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401811</link>
    <description>Where alleged bogus purchases are supported by purchase documents and banking payments, and the sales are not doubted, full disallowance is impermissible because sales ordinarily require corresponding purchases. The disputed purchases were treated as routed through the grey market, so the addition had to be confined to the profit element embedded in those purchases by aligning the gross profit rate with genuine purchases. The 100% addition was not sustained and the matter was remitted for fresh computation on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401811</link>
      <description>Where alleged bogus purchases are supported by purchase documents and banking payments, and the sales are not doubted, full disallowance is impermissible because sales ordinarily require corresponding purchases. The disputed purchases were treated as routed through the grey market, so the addition had to be confined to the profit element embedded in those purchases by aligning the gross profit rate with genuine purchases. The 100% addition was not sustained and the matter was remitted for fresh computation on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>