<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 596 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL - AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company, dispensing with meetings for Equity Shareholders and Secured Creditors based on consent affidavits. The Tribunal directed the Transferee Company to convene meetings for its Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors via video conferencing, with appointed Chairpersons and Scrutinizers. Notices and advertisements were mandated for these meetings, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s orders required reporting of meeting outcomes, and the application was allowed with comprehensive compliance instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 596 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL - AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company, dispensing with meetings for Equity Shareholders and Secured Creditors based on consent affidavits. The Tribunal directed the Transferee Company to convene meetings for its Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors via video conferencing, with appointed Chairpersons and Scrutinizers. Notices and advertisements were mandated for these meetings, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s orders required reporting of meeting outcomes, and the application was allowed with comprehensive compliance instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>