<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 584 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401785</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to submit a Revised Refund Request Form within a week, and upon receipt, the first respondent was instructed to process the refund within six weeks. The court emphasized the necessity for the petitioner to adhere to the prescribed procedure for seeking a refund as outlined in the relevant circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 584 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401785</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to submit a Revised Refund Request Form within a week, and upon receipt, the first respondent was instructed to process the refund within six weeks. The court emphasized the necessity for the petitioner to adhere to the prescribed procedure for seeking a refund as outlined in the relevant circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>