<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC considered whether the communication directing attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account complied with Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The matter concerns the statutory precondition and legal validity of provisional attachment under the GST framework. Notice was issued, counter affidavits are to be filed, and the case was listed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC considered whether the communication directing attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account complied with Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The matter concerns the statutory precondition and legal validity of provisional attachment under the GST framework. Notice was issued, counter affidavits are to be filed, and the case was listed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>