<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held a video conference hearing regarding the attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account. Respondent no.1 had directed the attachment without specifying any pending proceedings. The respondents were ordered to file their counter affidavits within two weeks, and the case was scheduled for further hearing on 8th January 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held a video conference hearing regarding the attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account. Respondent no.1 had directed the attachment without specifying any pending proceedings. The respondents were ordered to file their counter affidavits within two weeks, and the case was scheduled for further hearing on 8th January 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>