https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401779 Allegations of fraudulent GST invoicing and wrongful input tax credit justified refusal of regular bail where investigation remained pending. The court noted that invoices and e-way bills were allegedly issued without actual supply of goods, the claimed tax evasion was substantial, and authorities needed to trace the recipient chain and preserve electronic and forensic evidence. It also considered the allegation that the registered office and factory premises were non-existent and the risk of interference with investigation or tampering with evidence. On those facts, regular bail was rejected. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401779 Allegations of fraudulent GST invoicing and wrongful input tax credit justified refusal of regular bail where investigation remained pending. The court noted that invoices and e-way bills were allegedly issued without actual supply of goods, the claimed tax evasion was substantial, and authorities needed to trace the recipient chain and preserve electronic and forensic evidence. It also considered the allegation that the registered office and factory premises were non-existent and the risk of interference with investigation or tampering with evidence. On those facts, regular bail was rejected. Case-Laws GST Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401779