<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 574 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401775</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee. The notice initiating penalty proceedings was deemed defective and invalid, as the Assessing Officer failed to prove concealment of income. The court held that the explanations provided were satisfactory, and the penalty imposition was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 574 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401775</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee. The notice initiating penalty proceedings was deemed defective and invalid, as the Assessing Officer failed to prove concealment of income. The court held that the explanations provided were satisfactory, and the penalty imposition was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>