<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Reopening Invalid: ITO Lacked Jurisdiction After Legal Transfer in 2012, Section 124(3) Not Applicable. CIT Challenge Fails.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55908</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening of assessment - jurisdiction of ITO - In the appellant&#039;s case, the provision of section 124(3) does not come into play since the case of the assessee was legally transferred by the competent authority u/s. 127 as far back as in the year 2012. - Section 124(3) of the Act does not come into play in this case and so in no way help the Department to justify the action of ITO, Ward-5(3), Kolkata in issuing statutory notices to the assessee, which action itself was without jurisdiction. So the challenge raised by the Ld CIT, DR fails. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:56:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Reopening Invalid: ITO Lacked Jurisdiction After Legal Transfer in 2012, Section 124(3) Not Applicable. CIT Challenge Fails.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55908</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening of assessment - jurisdiction of ITO - In the appellant&#039;s case, the provision of section 124(3) does not come into play since the case of the assessee was legally transferred by the competent authority u/s. 127 as far back as in the year 2012. - Section 124(3) of the Act does not come into play in this case and so in no way help the Department to justify the action of ITO, Ward-5(3), Kolkata in issuing statutory notices to the assessee, which action itself was without jurisdiction. So the challenge raised by the Ld CIT, DR fails. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:56:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>