<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 221(1) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80P as a cooperative credit society was upheld, emphasizing their entitlement to the deduction. The Tribunal highlighted that the penalty was not sustainable after the quantum appeal resulted in a nil income determination, rendering the penalty order null and void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 221(1) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80P as a cooperative credit society was upheld, emphasizing their entitlement to the deduction. The Tribunal highlighted that the penalty was not sustainable after the quantum appeal resulted in a nil income determination, rendering the penalty order null and void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>