<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 548 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the AO conducted adequate verification regarding the increase in capital and the source of funds for the gifted flat. The PCIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed unwarranted as the AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 548 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the AO conducted adequate verification regarding the increase in capital and the source of funds for the gifted flat. The PCIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed unwarranted as the AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>