<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 547 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for failure to deduct TDS. However, issues regarding the applicability of Section 194C(5) and the retrospective application of an amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 547 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for failure to deduct TDS. However, issues regarding the applicability of Section 194C(5) and the retrospective application of an amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>