https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401731 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the assessing authority under the CST Act, 1956, and seeking correction of errors in the assessment order under A.P. VAT Rules. The court held that the representation made by the petitioner did not amount to a clerical or arithmetical error and emphasized the need to challenge orders promptly. Since there was no statutory provision for review, the court concluded that the representation sought to review the assessment without legal basis, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401731 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the assessing authority under the CST Act, 1956, and seeking correction of errors in the assessment order under A.P. VAT Rules. The court held that the representation made by the petitioner did not amount to a clerical or arithmetical error and emphasized the need to challenge orders promptly. Since there was no statutory provision for review, the court concluded that the representation sought to review the assessment without legal basis, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401731