<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292266</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only funds generating exempt income and to rectify the arithmetic error in the computation of &quot;profit and gains of business or profession.&quot; The order was pronounced in the open court on 27.02.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292266</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only funds generating exempt income and to rectify the arithmetic error in the computation of &quot;profit and gains of business or profession.&quot; The order was pronounced in the open court on 27.02.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>