<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 529 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401730</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee on all three substantial questions of law. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on the investment portfolio, disallowance of expenses related to exempted income was overturned, and it was determined that Section 194H was inapplicable to service charges, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 529 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401730</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee on all three substantial questions of law. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on the investment portfolio, disallowance of expenses related to exempted income was overturned, and it was determined that Section 194H was inapplicable to service charges, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>