https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401708 The Court upheld the trial Court's order directing the accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found the order justified due to the lack of defense from the accused, the presumption under Section 139 of the Act, and the legality of the trial Court's actions. The Court rejected the petitioner's arguments on the non-speaking order and lack of application under Section 143-A, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of process and secure justice. The petition was dismissed, and directions were issued for case disposal and fund disbursement under Section 143-A. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:35:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401708 The Court upheld the trial Court's order directing the accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found the order justified due to the lack of defense from the accused, the presumption under Section 139 of the Act, and the legality of the trial Court's actions. The Court rejected the petitioner's arguments on the non-speaking order and lack of application under Section 143-A, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of process and secure justice. The petition was dismissed, and directions were issued for case disposal and fund disbursement under Section 143-A. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401708