<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 501 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401702</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the addition of bogus purchases, violation of natural justice principles, and estimation of Gross Profit rate. The tribunal directed a de novo assessment by the AO, emphasizing the importance of allowing the assessee to cross-examine witnesses and submit relevant documents. The AO was instructed to provide a fair hearing before making a new determination. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 501 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401702</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the addition of bogus purchases, violation of natural justice principles, and estimation of Gross Profit rate. The tribunal directed a de novo assessment by the AO, emphasizing the importance of allowing the assessee to cross-examine witnesses and submit relevant documents. The AO was instructed to provide a fair hearing before making a new determination. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>