<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 493 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401694</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income. It emphasized the necessity of specifying clear grounds for penalty imposition and addressing legal challenges to ensure the validity of penalty orders. The ITAT found the lack of clarity regarding the reasons for the penalty rendered the order unsustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:35:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 493 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401694</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income. It emphasized the necessity of specifying clear grounds for penalty imposition and addressing legal challenges to ensure the validity of penalty orders. The ITAT found the lack of clarity regarding the reasons for the penalty rendered the order unsustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>